“If you don't have time to read, you don't have the time (or the tools) to write. Simple as that.” ― Stephen King
Week Five.
Challenge Writing Tasks.

Task 1.
Part one of Task 1 is the "Hello it's me" letter. Part two of Task 1 is a combination of observation, interview, and writing territory (inspired by the writing tasks offered).
Task 2.
Below is a picture of my notes for a reflection on readings from Katherine Bomer's book,
Hidden Gems, with regard to the placement school classroom. Typed below the picture is the draft those notes became. (The numbers scattered like a hot mess are the page numbers from the reading relevant to the idea they crowd beside.)
Challenge Writing Tasks.
The title for this week’s writing comes from Stephen King,
but I believe that Katherine Bomer would heartily agree, as she says that
reading “teach[es] us how words can look and sound on the page, and most often,
[reading] can offer up surprising differences from the staid old notions of good
writing that we picked up in our own schooling… the point is to read so that we
can teach with insider knowledge our lessons about both reading and writing”
(76).

Task 1.
Part one of Task 1 is the "Hello it's me" letter. Part two of Task 1 is a combination of observation, interview, and writing territory (inspired by the writing tasks offered).
These entries didn't lend themselves to keyboard revision; I think these belong on paper.
Immediately below are the entries from my GED students (taken from the right page pictured above) answering some questions on writing introduced by my mentor teacher to the not-so-different emerging writers of the placement school.
Below is a picture of my notes for a reflection on readings from Katherine Bomer's book,
My mentor teacher and the author Bomer seem largely in
agreement regarding how a classroom of writers should function. The students,
of course, don’t know this. They just know that writing is hard and think that
some of them “suck at it” (although I haven’t seen any truly “sucky” writers
yet, our mentor teacher assures us that they’re there), and as middle
schoolers, they’re not looking much further than that. But, to my excitement,
they’re all willing to write, so we can begin to see how Bomer’s theory looks
in the experienced classroom.
Bomer and my mentor teacher (and me, too!) think that a
conversation about student writing begins with “what’s good.” (This is how I run my GED classroom- I find
what’s good before I start to show how their writing should better play the
game of the GED test, and I wonder how much that contributes, if it
contributes, to some of the responses in the writing task above. After reading
Bomer, I’m starting to talk about my student’s writing in a way that acknowledges
their “specific writing gifts” (Bomer 16). It was so much fun seeing how talking
about their sentences and ideas like Bomer does just makes their faces shine! “I
can write?!” they ask in joyful uncertainty. But I digress.) The focus isn’t
correction, isn’t the “red pen [marking] all over it” (Bomer 16), but instead,
because “our responses to young people learning to write matter more than we
can ever know” (Bomer 17), the focus is finding what’s good, giving some
validation, and then and only then, in the words of my mentor teacher, “making
it suck less.”
But part of the answer to making writing suck less isn’t
easily forced into the public-school classroom. As Kittle and Bomer and many
other researchers and teachers of writing have found (and likely knew all
along), writing is better when it feels real and relevant. To this end, my mentor
teacher shows an invested awareness of what each student cares about. (“It’s so
hard to get [student name] to see anything other than dirt bikes wooshing
across his brain,” she tells me of a student I had just finished workshopping
with. He wrote well and never mentioned dirt bikes, but I have a hunch as the
months march on, knowing his passion for dirt bikes may prove useful in making
a connection and keeping him motivated.) But, as Bomer acknowledges, student
writers will “read and write texts for different readers and purposes” (60). We
can help them almost enjoy trudging through academic writing by using “joyful
and jaunty words” (Bomer 85) to discuss their writing, words that come from
their real worlds of movies and video games, and create a discussion on their
writing together (Bomer 87). I think that shared investment is where we’ll find
writing maybe doesn’t “totally suck.”
And this begins where everything in school should begin-
with meeting the student where they are.
Bomer, Katherine. Hidden
Gems: Naming and Teaching from the
Brilliance in Every Student's Writing. Heinemann, 2010.



Comments
Post a Comment